Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Maryland

Datawatch Systems, Inc.

Bethesda, MD · ~313 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Datawatch Systems, Inc. runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade B.

Datawatch Systems, Inc.: 1.7 TCR = 64% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Datawatch Systems, Inc. safety composite

Datawatch Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2021→2024

Datawatch Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Datawatch Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 2.1 in 2021 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.1 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Bethesda, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 64% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Smith Security Syste…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~313 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smith Security System, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Datawatch Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Datawatch Systems, Inc. averages 1.7 TCR (64% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Datawatch Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2021=2.1 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Datawatch Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Maryland.

Datawatch Systems, Inc. (313 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Datawatch Systems, Inc.
Datawatch Systems, Inc. (313 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Datawatch Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 5 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 7 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2021 2.1 1.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · MD · Bethesda

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 107 employers in Bethesda, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smith Security System, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woburn FS (SSS, CSS) 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total Fire & Safety, Inc 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warwick Mushroom Farms LLC 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bakery Express - Mid Atlantic 312 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick MD (Distribution) 314 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCI Health Services 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Coats, Inc. 6,040 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vador Ventures Inc 5,569 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark (Clark Construction, Clark Concrete,Clark Civil, Clark Foundations) 2,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark Construction Group LLC 2,313 FTE
NAT-TCR Flint 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oldcastle Building Envelope 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Vistar Retail West - 4007 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Erskine Ops 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2479 - LA Sunset 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE New York Botanical Garden 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartville Hardware 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miner's Ace Hardware 313 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.