Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · California

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS)

Fremont, CA · ~68 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade B.

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS): 1.6 TCR = 63% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) safety composite

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) held a steady TCR band

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS)'s TCR held near 0.3 from 1.3 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.3 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Fremont, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 63% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #8/21
  • PHOTO Total Fire & Safety,…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Total Fire & Safety, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) averages 1.6 TCR (63% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.6 · BLS 2.6

Where Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 21 Security alarm systems sales c employers in California.

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) (68 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fremont FS (SSS,CSS)
Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) (68 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Fremont FS (SSS,CSS) has more employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.5 1.3 2 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · CA · Fremont

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Total Fire & Safety, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northlake FS (SSS,CSS) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Datawatch Systems, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Irving FS (SSS, CSS) 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Valley Land Co. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCFFO 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE VinePro Vineyard Management, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knights Grapevine Nursery 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR Rain CII Carbon - Chalmette Plant 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 44311c - Jacksonville 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Derse Corporate & Milwaukee 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Upper Marlboro, MD 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Woodlands of Hamilton Assisted Living 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE JX Truck Center Green Bay 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shady Lake 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE USCS- Syracuse, UT 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.