Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing · California

Datron Advanced Technologies

Simi Valley, CA · ~122 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Datron Advanced Technologies runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Datron Advanced Technologies: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Datron Advanced Technologies safety composite

Datron Advanced Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Datron Advanced Technologies: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.73× in 2023

Datron Advanced Technologies's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2019 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Simi Valley, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #21/43
  • PHOTO RMS
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RMS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Datron Advanced Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Datron Advanced Technologies averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Datron Advanced Technologies TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Datron Advanced Technologies falls in its industry

247 Antennas, transmitting and rec establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 43 Antennas, transmitting and rec employers in California.

Datron Advanced Technologies (122 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Datron Advanced Technologies
Datron Advanced Technologies (122 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Datron Advanced Technologies has more employees than the Antennas, transmitting and receiving, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · CA · Simi Valley

247 Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 139 employers in Simi Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RMS 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Mezzalingua Associates LLC dba JMA Wireless Liverpool 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doron Precision Systems, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allen Office 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chase Ranch 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE McGrath Ranch 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sran Ag ll 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meggitt Safety Systems, Inc. 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHSV001 - HOSPITAL 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Simi Valley 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milgard Manufacturing Simi Valley CA 511 FTE
NAT-TCR YUSA Corporation 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wrightstown 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR North Charleston, SC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Coastal Construction - Aston Martin Residences 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plains LPG Services 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cabot Corporation Tuscola 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Kiln & Dryer Group - Louisville, KY 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanical Service & Systems Inc. 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.