Construction management, power and communication transmission line · Maryland

Day and Sons Inc.

Curtis Bay, MD · ~50 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Day and Sons Inc. runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, power and communication transmission line workplace, earning a grade D.

Day and Sons Inc.: 3.6 TCR = 130% of Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Day and Sons Inc. safety composite

Day and Sons Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2017→2024

Day and Sons Inc. injury rate improved

Day and Sons Inc.'s TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Curtis Bay, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 130% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/26
  • PHOTO North Little Rock, A…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Little Rock, AR Office CS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Day and Sons Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Day and Sons Inc. averages 3.6 TCR (130% of the Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Day and Sons Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Day and Sons Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Construction management, power establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 26 Construction management, power employers in Maryland.

Day and Sons Inc. (50 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Day and Sons Inc.
Day and Sons Inc. (50 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Day and Sons Inc. has fewer employees than the Construction management, power and commu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 1 1 0
2019 10.3 10.3 5 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 4.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MD · Curtis Bay

1,605 Construction management, power and communication transmission line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 22 employers in Curtis Bay, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Little Rock, AR Office CS 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eilertson Iowa Division 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Future Infrastructure - Austin 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR IVWWD - Wildwood- FL 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Leaf Extracts LLC dba gLeaf 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bell Nursery - Burtonsville 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS - Annapolis Junction, MD - 1AJMD 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company TPM 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brandon Shores 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manuel Luis Construction Company, Inc./M Luis Products, LLC 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAL-ODFL 134 FTE
NAT-TCR Head Start/Ehs/Ehs-Cc Admin 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 235 Washington Street 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Nut Co., Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Shorewood 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE All Metal Stamping, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Distribution - Nature's Way 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Station 93 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoreline Metal Fabricators, Inc. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.