Flat springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · Michigan

Dayco Products - Roseville

Roseville, MI · ~53 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dayco Products - Roseville runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Flat springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Dayco Products - Roseville: 3.4 TCR = 104% of Flat springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dayco Products - Roseville safety composite

Dayco Products - Roseville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2023

Dayco Products - Roseville injury rate improved

Dayco Products - Roseville's TCR fell 5.2 from 6.8 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · Roseville, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 104% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/16
  • PHOTO Newcomb Spring of TN
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Newcomb Spring of TN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Dayco Products - Roseville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dayco Products - Roseville averages 3.4 TCR (104% of the Flat springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dayco Products - Roseville TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Dayco Products - Roseville falls in its industry

189 Flat springs, heavy gauge meta establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 16 Flat springs, heavy gauge meta employers in Michigan.

Dayco Products - Roseville (53 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dayco Products - Roseville
Dayco Products - Roseville (53 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Dayco Products - Roseville has fewer employees than the Flat springs, heavy gauge metal, manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.7 3.9 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2018 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2017 3.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 6.8 3.4 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · MI · Roseville

189 Flat springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 82 employers in Roseville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Newcomb Spring of TN 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISCO 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medicoil 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Associated Spring Bristol Division 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE EDL- Lansing Office 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Energy - Newaygo 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Livonia 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commercial Contractors, Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4003 - TPG/PBM 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4002 - TPG/PBS (inc 4009) 565 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2959 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCO Engineering, Inc. 417 FTE
NAT-TCR SWB-LC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NASG Tennessee South, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Us Autoforce San Antonio 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Horizons Window Fashions 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Homeward Bound, Brooklyn Park 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 08-Atlanta 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona Corrugated Container 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penn Cove Shellfish LLC 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.