Halogenated hydrocarbon derivatives (except aromatic) manufacturing · Texas

Deer Park VCM Plant

Deer Park, TX · ~72 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Deer Park VCM Plant runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Halogenated hydrocarbon derivatives (except aromatic) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Deer Park VCM Plant: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Halogenated hydrocarbon derivatives (except aromatic) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Deer Park VCM Plant safety composite

Deer Park VCM Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Deer Park VCM Plant held a steady TCR band

Deer Park VCM Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325199 · Deer Park, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #48/103
  • PHOTO Cytec Solvay Group W…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cytec Solvay Group Willow Island Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Deer Park VCM Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Deer Park VCM Plant averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Halogenated hydrocarbon derivatives (except aromatic) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Deer Park VCM Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Deer Park VCM Plant falls in its industry

552 Halogenated hydrocarbon deriva establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 103 Halogenated hydrocarbon deriva employers in Texas.

Deer Park VCM Plant (72 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Deer Park VCM Plant
Deer Park VCM Plant (72 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Deer Park VCM Plant has fewer employees than the Halogenated hydrocarbon derivatives (exc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2020 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325199 · TX · Deer Park

552 Halogenated hydrocarbon derivatives (except aromatic) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 174 employers in Deer Park, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cytec Solvay Group Willow Island Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cambridge Isotope Labs (Tewksbury) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BASF 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hopkinsville KY Facility 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Rice 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holmes Foods Inc / Hatchery 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGL WATER SOLUTIONS, LLC-MIDLAND 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Plant Service, Inc. 3,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Plant Services, LLC 2,807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bilfinger Inc 1,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dashiell/Dacon Corporation 1,118 FTE
NAT-TCR Minneapolis 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Pascagoula Campus (1212) 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Witherup 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Summa Medical Group 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arriscraft Fort Valley 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckhorn Saw Mill & Millwork Distribution 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carteret-Craven Electric Cooperative 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Entire Company 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.