Installation or servicing of building equipment · Minnesota

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN

Arden Hills, MN · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Installation or servicing of building equipment workplace, earning a grade A.

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN: 0.5 TCR = 18% of Installation or servicing of building equipment BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN safety composite

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2019→2021

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN injury rate improved

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Arden Hills, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/25
  • PHOTO Intelligrated System…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Intelligrated Systems, LLC, dba Honeywell Intelligrated and its successors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN averages 0.5 TCR (18% of the Installation or servicing of building equipment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN TCR series: 2019=1.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN falls in its industry

1,138 Installation or servicing of b establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 25 Installation or servicing of b employers in Minnesota.

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN (54 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN
Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN (54 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Diebold Nixdorf Arden Hills MN has more employees than the Installation or servicing of building eq median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · MN · Arden Hills

1,138 Installation or servicing of building equipment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 51 employers in Arden Hills, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Intelligrated Systems, LLC, dba Honeywell Intelligrated and its successors 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Richmond 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Sacramento 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Memphis 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Center 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 09 Eveleth 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elder-Jones Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haldeman Homme, Inc. - Minneapolis - Corporate 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific CRM 2,778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Land O'Lakes - Arden Hills Corporate Offices 2,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR Land O'Lakes, Inc. 1,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Viessmann Manufacturing Company (US) 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 44241c - Byron Pec 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at St. Anthony Hospital-Transport 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Tree Pharmacy #518/118 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crossroads Mobile Maintenance Michigan 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Girard Wood Products Lacey 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preco, Inc. -KS 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Connecticut Coining, Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.