Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · Missouri

Dogwood Energy Facility

Pleasant Hill, MO · ~24 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dogwood Energy Facility runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade B.

Dogwood Energy Facility: 0.7 TCR = 57% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dogwood Energy Facility safety composite

Dogwood Energy Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dogwood Energy Facility held a steady TCR band

Dogwood Energy Facility's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Pleasant Hill, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.7 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/42
  • PHOTO Southern Minnesota M…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Dogwood Energy Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dogwood Energy Facility averages 0.7 TCR (57% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dogwood Energy Facility TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Dogwood Energy Facility falls in its industry

846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 42 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in Missouri.

Dogwood Energy Facility (24 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dogwood Energy Facility
Dogwood Energy Facility (24 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Dogwood Energy Facility has fewer employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MO · Pleasant Hill

846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 11 employers in Pleasant Hill, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00216 PRESTON OFFICE 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHESTFLD PW ST 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR T. E. S. Filer City Station 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vanduser Gin Co Inc 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Service and Supply Cooperative, Bellflower MO 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Osage Plant 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - 930 North Olive 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radmacher Brothers Excavating Co., Inc. 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Office 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasant Hill Health and Rehabilitation Center 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independence Custom Fabricaotrs, Inc 76 FTE
NAT-TCR EnergySolutions 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR D. H. Griffin Wrecking Company, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenville Division 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Altoona Lodging, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Barton Solvents, Inc. KC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renishaw Inc-Auburn Hills, MI 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Markham Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE YKK AP America - Cincinnati, Ohio Facility 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.