Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing · Connecticut

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury

Danbury, CT · ~261 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury: 1.5 TCR = 44% of Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury safety composite

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury held a steady TCR band

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.8 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335314 · Danbury, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO Rockwell Automation-…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~261 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rockwell Automation- Twinsburg OH (TWB) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury averages 1.5 TCR (44% of the Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury falls in its industry

156 Control circuit relays, indust establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Control circuit relays, indust employers in Connecticut.

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury (261 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury
DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury (261 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 1.3

DRS Consolidated Controls Inc.- Danbury has more employees than the Control circuit relays, industrial, manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.5 0.8 4 0 0
2017 1.1 0.4 2 1 0
2016 1.8 1.4 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335314 · CT · Danbury

156 Control circuit relays, industrial, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 171 employers in Danbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Automation- Twinsburg OH (TWB) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Automation- Richland Center WI (RCH) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auma Actuators 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coral Springs - 4300 Coral Ridge Drive 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mirion Technologies (Canberra), Inc. 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamden Markets LLC, dba ShopRite of Hamden 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE 55835 HARTFORD 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE 64 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR DANBURY HOSPITAL INC. 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR Board of Education 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western CT Medical Group 1,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Connecticut Medical Group 1,239 FTE
NAT-TCR Heritage Oaks West Retirement Village 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Savannah Service Center 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Baker Interiors Furniture - HDC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MPS Woodridge 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florence Manufacturing Facility 261 FTE
NAT-SIZE HopeTree Family Services 261 FTE
NAT-SIZE HealthTrust Supply Chain Continental Division 261 FTE
NAT-SIZE FGG R Boss 261 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.