Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Indiana

Eagle Valley Inc.

Indianapolis, IN · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eagle Valley Inc. runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Eagle Valley Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 69% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eagle Valley Inc. safety composite

Eagle Valley Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Eagle Valley Inc.: 0.0 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 3.13× in 2024

Eagle Valley Inc.'s TCR rose 6.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 3.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 69% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #8/25
  • PHOTO SAK Construction, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SAK Construction, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Eagle Valley Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eagle Valley Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (69% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eagle Valley Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5 · 2022=0 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=6 · BLS 2.8

Where Eagle Valley Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 25 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Indiana.

Eagle Valley Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eagle Valley Inc.
Eagle Valley Inc. (31 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Eagle Valley Inc. has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2023 6.3 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · IN · Indianapolis

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SAK Construction, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANDERSON GRADING AND PIPELINE LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moore Excavation Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genesis Construction 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - INW 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Pullet Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whitestown, IN 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sullivan Service Center 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Navitor East - 0104 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR West Coast Paving 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisk Electric Company - Miami, FL 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chestnut Hill 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE MLD Technologies, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Brighton 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forks Distribution Center 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gasparini Landscaping Company Inc 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.