Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Georgia

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC

Monroe, GA · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC: 1.9 TCR = 69% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC safety composite

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC: 0.0 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC's TCR rose 6.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Monroe, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/33
  • PHOTO Eagle Valley Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eagle Valley Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC averages 1.9 TCR (69% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 33 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Georgia.

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC (34 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC
Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC (34 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Anderson Grading and Pipeline LLC has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 0.0 3 0 0
2023 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2022 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · GA · Monroe

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 37 employers in Monroe, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eagle Valley Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAK Construction, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moore Excavation Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genesis Construction 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Total Timberland Services LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Business Office - 1001 Prince Ave. Athens 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neese District Jackson EMC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE JACKSON EMC - NEESE 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hitachi Astemo 996 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc 957 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6055 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6055 889 FTE
NAT-TCR GLS Electric Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR View Homes San Antonio 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Piggly Wiggly 284 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Escape Game Jacksonville LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE BDRIN-Lafayette 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detdc-B5510-Afh- Detroit Dc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Northampton Cc Resident Dini 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pleasant Valley ICF 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.