Pipe, metal, merchant wholesalers · Pennsylvania

Forks Distribution Center

Easton, PA · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forks Distribution Center runs at 202% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pipe, metal, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Forks Distribution Center: 4.5 TCR = 202% of Pipe, metal, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forks Distribution Center safety composite

Forks Distribution Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2016→2024

Forks Distribution Center injury rate improved

Forks Distribution Center's TCR fell 6.3 from 9.3 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423510 · Easton, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 202% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #35/70
  • PHOTO Ryerson-4007
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ryerson-4007 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Forks Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forks Distribution Center averages 4.5 TCR (202% of the Pipe, metal, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forks Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=3 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Forks Distribution Center falls in its industry

1,299 Pipe, metal, merchant wholesal establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 70 Pipe, metal, merchant wholesal employers in Pennsylvania.

Forks Distribution Center (31 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Forks Distribution Center
Forks Distribution Center (31 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Forks Distribution Center has fewer employees than the Pipe, metal, merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2022 5.9 2.9 2 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 9.1 6.1 3 0 0
2016 9.3 3.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423510 · PA · Easton

1,299 Pipe, metal, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 182 employers in Easton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ryerson-4007 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amarr - New Jersey Hub 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acra Cast 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BICO Akron, Inc. 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spawn Plant 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest Mushrooms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLSC Cocalico Service Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenixville Service Building 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ABE4 1,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAFAYETTE COLLEGE 1,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Victaulic - Forks 1,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radial - Easton 2 1,181 FTE
NAT-TCR Scotland County Government 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Scheurer Hospital 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR American Fine Sinter Co., Ltd 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Prinsco, Inc. - Fargo 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Brighton 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE MLD Technologies, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gasparini Landscaping Company Inc 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Recycling Chattanooga 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.