Refrigerator/freezer combinations, household-type, manufacturing · North Carolina

Electrolux Corporate Offices

Charlotte, NC · ~1,000 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electrolux Corporate Offices runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Refrigerator/freezer combinations, household-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Electrolux Corporate Offices: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Refrigerator/freezer combinations, household-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electrolux Corporate Offices safety composite

Electrolux Corporate Offices scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 59%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

84/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Electrolux Corporate Offices held a steady TCR band

Electrolux Corporate Offices's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.1 · 2019=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335222 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P94
  • PHOTO Whirlpool Corporation
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~1,000 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Whirlpool Corporation (1.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Electrolux Corporate Offices in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electrolux Corporate Offices averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Refrigerator/freezer combinations, household-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electrolux Corporate Offices TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2019=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Electrolux Corporate Offices falls in its industry

16 Refrigerator/freezer combinati establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Electrolux Corporate Offices (1,000 employees, TCR 0.2) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 166 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 10 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sub-Zero Built-InViking Range, LLC - Refrigeration ProductsSupply Chain - DecaturNorcold SidneyU-Line CorporationWhirlpool CorporationNorcold GettysburgDerby Industries, LLC GalesburgNorthland CorporationElectrolux Corporate Offices
Electrolux Corporate Offices (1,000 employees, TCR 0.2) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 166 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Electrolux Corporate Offices has more employees than the Refrigerator/freezer combinations, house median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.4 0.0 4 0 0
2016 0.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335222 · NC · Charlotte

16 Refrigerator/freezer combinations, household-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Whirlpool Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sub-Zero Built-In 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain - Decatur 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Whirlpool Corporation- Ottawa 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2636-DURHAM.NORTH CAROLINA - REMOTE 1,001 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novant Health Huntersville Medical Center 1,002 FTE
STATE-SIZE RTP 1,003 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASHEVILLE NC 997 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR CSP Corporate Headquarters 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TS Power Plant 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 102925 - Boeing Factory Transformation 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Motors Rochester Operations 1,000 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital Regional Medical Center 1,000 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koch Foods of Cumming 1,000 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Behavioral Health Services, Inc. 1,000 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.