Automotive engine repair and replacement shops · Minnesota

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace

Name: Emergency Apparatus Maintenace Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Lino Lakes, MN · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 6.5
Avg TCR: 2.1
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace runs at 311% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automotive engine repair and replacement shops workplace, earning a grade F.

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace: 6.5 TCR = 311% of Automotive engine repair and replacement shops BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace safety composite

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 6.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers
DART rate: F 6.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2017

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace injury rate improved

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace's TCR fell 0.7 from 6.9 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811111 · Lino Lakes, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 311% of ind

DART 6.2 DART
RANK #33/53
PHOTO WGM
BOOK 2y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WGM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

6.5
WGM

6.5
SHELBYVILLE SH

6.5
Fleet Repair S

6.5
CCSF, Fleet Ma

6.5

What this shows Emergency Apparatus Maintenace averages 6.5 TCR (311% of the Automotive engine repair and replacement shops BLS benchmark).

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=6.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Emergency Apparatus Maintenace falls in its industry

609 Automotive engine repair and r establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 53 Automotive engine repair and r employers in Minnesota.

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace (31 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Emergency Apparatus Maintenace has fewer employees than the Automotive engine repair and replacement median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	6.2	6.2	1	1	0
2016	6.9	3.4	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811111 · MN · Lino Lakes

609 Automotive engine repair and replacement shops employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 42 employers in Lino Lakes, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	WGM	SANGER, CA	6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	SHELBYVILLE SHOP	SHELBYVILLE, IN	6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Fleet Repair Solutions	GRANTVILLE, PA	6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	CCSF, Fleet Management	SAN FRANCISCO, CA	6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	High Island Dairy	LE SUEUR	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Protein Sources, LLP	MAPLETON	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Black Dog Gen Plant-UC	BURNSVILLE	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Power Plant	HIBBING	31 FTE
CITY-NEAR	YMCA in Lino Lakes	Lino Lakes	5,690 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes	Lino Lakes	516 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MCF - Lino Lakes	Lino Lakes	420 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1448 - Lino Lakes	Lino Lakes	353 FTE
NAT-TCR	0076 - Independence, MO	Independence, MO	6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sulphur Springs (Txsul)	Sulphur Springs, TX	6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Bangor (Meban)	Brewer, ME	6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	HITCO Carbon Composites, Inc.	Gardena, CA	6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Martin Overhead Garage Door Service Inc.	St. Peters, MO	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Superior Lawns Inc.-Plainfield Branch	Plainfield, IL	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Bieker Electric, Inc.	Fort Smith, AR	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	0175 - Laurel, Md	Laurel, MD	31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.