Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing · Texas

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US,

Pasadena, TX · ~65 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US,: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, safety composite

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US,: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US,'s TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Pasadena, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/59
  • PHOTO Engineered Controls …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Engineered Controls International, LLC (ECI) - Elon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, TCR series: 2019=0 · 2021=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, falls in its industry

298 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 59 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., employers in Texas.

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, (65 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US,
Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, (65 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control US, has fewer employees than the Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, ga median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · TX · Pasadena

298 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 385 employers in Pasadena, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Engineered Controls International, LLC (ECI) - Elon 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NIBCO Nacogdoches 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITT Engineered Valves LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tescom Corporation 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE HANSFORD COUNTY FEEDERS, LP 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northside Farms, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilco Peanut Co. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2348-Aiken, TX 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSC Group 4,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroleum Service Corporation 3,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR JVIC 3,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brand Energy Solutions, LLC - Houston 2,015 FTE
NAT-TCR Cypress Healthcare 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 44531g - Kings Mountain Pec 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MPD, Inc. Main Campus 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR District Court 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4001 - Eau Claire Admin 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marysville OH Terminal 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springs Window Fashions 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clackams, OR Office CS 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.