Electric power distribution systems · Oregon

Eugene Water and Electric Board

Eugene, OR · ~493 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eugene Water and Electric Board runs at 283% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Eugene Water and Electric Board: 3.4 TCR = 283% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eugene Water and Electric Board safety composite

Eugene Water and Electric Board scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2019→2023

Eugene Water and Electric Board injury rate improved

Eugene Water and Electric Board's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.9 in 2019 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.9 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Eugene, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.4 · 283% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #13/26
  • PHOTO Emery Generating Sta…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~493 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Emery Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Eugene Water and Electric Board in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eugene Water and Electric Board averages 3.4 TCR (283% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eugene Water and Electric Board TCR series: 2019=3.9 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Eugene Water and Electric Board falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 26 Electric power distribution sy employers in Oregon.

Eugene Water and Electric Board (493 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eugene Water and Electric Board
Eugene Water and Electric Board (493 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Eugene Water and Electric Board has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 1.4 10 2 0
2022 2.0 0.8 7 3 0
2021 4.4 2.1 13 8 0
2020 4.3 2.8 19 1 0
2019 3.9 2.2 16 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · OR · Eugene

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 466 employers in Eugene, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Emery Generating Station 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Navasota Valley Electric Cooperative Inc.- Franklin 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardendale Crew Headquarters 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Forks Service Center-BB 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Powin, LLC. 494 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eugene Water & Electric Board 495 FTE
STATE-SIZE St Charles Health System Redmond 495 FTE
STATE-SIZE PNW Veg Co LLC dba Norpac 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR MATT KNIGHT ARENA 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hult Center for the Performing Arts 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHMG PHOR Clinics 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHMC at University District 564 FTE
NAT-TCR BFG Supply Co-Grand Rapids 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1951 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ayer 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nye Pointe 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - Chaboya Division 493 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centura Lab 493 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mando America Corporation 493 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairbanks Scales 493 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.