Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh

Name: Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Pittsburgh, PA · ~71 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · September 26, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.2
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh: 2.2 TCR = 59% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh safety composite

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers
DART rate: D 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh: 0.0 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2018

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh's TCR rose 4.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 59% of ind

DART 4.5 DART
RANK #18/257
PHOTO Brookdale Stonestreet
BOOK 2y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Stonestreet (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.2
Brookdale Ston

2.2
Russellville P

2.2
Cplace Zachary

2.2
Palms at La Qu

2.2

What this shows Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh averages 2.2 TCR (59% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh (71 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	4.5	4.5	3	0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Brookdale Stonestreet	LOUISVILLE, KY	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Russellville Park	PORTLAND, OR	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cplace Zachary ALF, LLC	ZACHARY, LA	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Palms at La Quinta	LA QUINTA, CA	2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	9288-764	GETTYSBURG	71 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Clarion Healthcare and Rehabilitation	CLARION	71 FTE
STATE-SIZE	New Holland Block Plant	NEW HOLLAND	71 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Consolidated Glass	NEW CASTLE	71 FTE
CITY-NEAR	United States Steel COrporation	Pittsburgh	15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Pittsburgh- Oakland	Pittsburgh	14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH)	Pittsburgh	13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Pittsburgh-Oakland	Pittsburgh	13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR	Property Management - Parks and Recreation	Greensboro, NC	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Shopko Hometown #791 (Forest City, IA)	Forest City, IA	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp.	Galena, KS	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hayes Manufacturing, Inc	Fife Lake, MI	2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Shopko Store #7 (Lacrosse, WI (South))	Lacrosse, WI	71 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Shopko Store #38 (Grand Island, NE)	Grand Island, NE	71 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Shopko Store #32 (Monona, WI)	Monona, WI	71 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Shopko Store #1 (Green Bay, WI (West))	Green Bay, WI	71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.