Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Fleet: Ontario SDO

Ontario, CA · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fleet: Ontario SDO runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Fleet: Ontario SDO: 2.3 TCR = 35% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fleet: Ontario SDO safety composite

Fleet: Ontario SDO scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

84/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2023→2024

Fleet: Ontario SDO injury rate improved

Fleet: Ontario SDO's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.3 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/710
  • PHOTO 598
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 598 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fleet: Ontario SDO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fleet: Ontario SDO averages 2.3 TCR (35% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fleet: Ontario SDO TCR series: 2023=4.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Fleet: Ontario SDO falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 710 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in California.

Fleet: Ontario SDO (61 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Fleet: Ontario SDO
Fleet: Ontario SDO (61 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Fleet: Ontario SDO has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.6 4.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · Ontario

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 598 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DIXIE WAREHOUSE (KYISC) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 18176130 18176130-WORLD COURIER, INC. - MA WILMINGTON 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAYUC - YUCCA VALLEY 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silveira Farms 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Brucherie Produce, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olds Ranch 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1750 Production Office 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Oliver Rubber Company 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The United States Playing Card Company 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Century Manufacturing Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Expert Optics 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Crane Swedesboro 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Crane Crystal Lake 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bogner Construction 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utah Pacific bridge & Steel LTD 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.