Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Florida

Florida Aero Precision

Lake Park, FL · ~35 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Florida Aero Precision runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Florida Aero Precision: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Florida Aero Precision safety composite

Florida Aero Precision scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2019→2024

Florida Aero Precision injury rate improved

Florida Aero Precision's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Lake Park, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/24
  • PHOTO Rolls-Royce: Banded …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rolls-Royce: Banded Stator (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Florida Aero Precision in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Florida Aero Precision averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Florida Aero Precision TCR series: 2019=2.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Florida Aero Precision falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 24 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Florida.

Florida Aero Precision (35 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Florida Aero Precision
Florida Aero Precision (35 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Florida Aero Precision has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · FL · Lake Park

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 29 employers in Lake Park, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce: Banded Stator 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Praxair GE Technologies 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HoneywellAZ10 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ladybug Farms Inc 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flying W Cattle Company 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridge 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merritt Island Service Center 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR National Center for Missing & Exploited Children - LAKE PARK, FL 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3348 364 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3348 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR MASCHMEYER CONCRETE COMPANY INC. 272 FTE
NAT-TCR Hessmer Nursing 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR INEOS Composites US, LLC - Los Angeles 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR NC Seattle 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CASD - Memphis HQ TN FXFE-MHQ 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harvest Sherwood Food Distributors Salt Lake City 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trimpac 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE CONVERGENTZ 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chambersburg, PA 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.