Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Indiana

Honeywell International Inc.

South Bend, IN · ~419 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell International Inc. runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honeywell International Inc.: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell International Inc. safety composite

Honeywell International Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2024

Honeywell International Inc. injury rate improved

Honeywell International Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 0.9 in 2022 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.9 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · South Bend, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #4/24
  • PHOTO Florida Aero Precision
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~419 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Florida Aero Precision (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Honeywell International Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honeywell International Inc. averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honeywell International Inc. TCR series: 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Honeywell International Inc. falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 24 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Indiana.

Honeywell International Inc. (419 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Honeywell International Inc.
Honeywell International Inc. (419 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Honeywell International Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 0 1 0
2023 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.9 0.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · IN · South Bend

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 318 employers in South Bend, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Florida Aero Precision 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce: Banded Stator 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rhinestahl CTS 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walbar Peabody LLC (Peabody MA) 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 2818 419 FTE
STATE-SIZE 300000170856827 - IN-Gary-Operating Center 419 FTE
STATE-SIZE N1 Bloomington Campus 419 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herff Jones 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital South Bend 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph County 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fourwinds Casino South Bend 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell IN08 810 FTE
NAT-TCR Syntech Systems, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverview House 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CalAmp - Carlsbad 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Unitherm Columbia 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Auto Supply State Fair 419 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeland Fresh Kitchen Manufacturing 419 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Region WSDOT 419 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Region WSDOT 419 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.