Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing · Tennessee

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington

Lexington, TN · ~306 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington safety composite

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2019→2020

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington injury rate improved

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.1 in 2019 to 0.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.1 · 2020=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326220 · Lexington, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Fenner Precision Pol…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~306 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fenner Precision Polymers Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington TCR series: 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington falls in its industry

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo employers in Tennessee.

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington (306 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington
Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington (306 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Fluid Routing Solutions Lexington has more employees than the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevato median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2019 3.1 1.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326220 · TN · Lexington

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 35 employers in Lexington, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fenner Precision Polymers Main 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watson Marlow, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intralox, LLC - Grand Rapids MI 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NewAge Industries Inc - Southampton 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE KIRCHHOFF AUTOMOTIVE MANCHESTER 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4483 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE EMJ Corporation 307 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barn 305 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9722 502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adient 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR FRS 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 684 330 FTE
NAT-TCR K & M Indiana dba Mitchell Plastics 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR VT Mobile Aerospace Engineering, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Outhouse 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR A & A Machinery Moving, Inc. Morrisville, PA 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kansas City, Missouri 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE IEW Construction Group 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hood Container of Louisiana 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mulcahy Nickolaus LLC 306 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.