Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise · South Carolina

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE)

Fort Mill, SC · ~501 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE): 0.9 TCR = 16% of Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) safety composite

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2019

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) injury rate improved

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE)'s TCR fell 0.7 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2019=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fort Mill, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #21/160
  • PHOTO L'Oreal USA S/D Inc.…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~501 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L'Oreal USA S/D Inc. - Dayton Charles Ct Distribution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) averages 0.9 TCR (16% of the Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2019=0.6 · BLS 5.8

Where Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing (including foreign establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 160 Warehousing (including foreign employers in South Carolina.

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) (501 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE)
Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) (501 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Fort Mill DC (GTS, PTE) has more employees than the Warehousing (including foreign trade zon median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.6 0.6 3 0 0
2017 1.3 1.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · Fort Mill

9,477 Warehousing (including foreign trade zones), general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 121 employers in Fort Mill, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L'Oreal USA S/D Inc. - Dayton Charles Ct Distribution 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA IL Effingham DSC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR York Csc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cincinnati - 10121 Princeton Glendale Road 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Corp. & Engineering 501 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4701-811 501 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpek Polyester USA, LLC-Columbia Site 500 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Francis Eastside 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center SEDC 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center - SEDC 1,078 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shutterfly Fort Mill 841 FTE
CITY-NEAR US FOODS FORT MILL 719 FTE
NAT-TCR Duro Bag - Florence 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 3029 Keystone 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ERSE 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CardioFocus 500 Nickerson 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dbl1 501 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brooks Brothers Group - Southwick 501 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Well Services, LLC 501 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. - Adelanto 501 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.