General warehousing and storage · Michigan

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park

Highland Park, MI · ~965 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park: 0.9 TCR = 16% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park safety composite

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2021→2024

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park injury rate improved

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.3 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Highland Park, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/194
  • PHOTO L'Oreal USA S/D Inc.…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~965 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L'Oreal USA S/D Inc. - Dayton Charles Ct Distribution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park averages 0.9 TCR (16% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park TCR series: 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 194 General warehousing and storag employers in Michigan.

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park (965 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park
Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park (965 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 12 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 6 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MI · Highland Park

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Highland Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L'Oreal USA S/D Inc. - Dayton Charles Ct Distribution 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA IL Effingham DSC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR York Csc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cincinnati - 10121 Princeton Glendale Road 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE One Energy Plaza 965 FTE
STATE-SIZE 9379-10 963 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Lansing 967 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Haven Area Public Schools 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Wine and Spirits 1,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Seating Detroit 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR John E. Green Company 760 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yanfeng Highland Park 650 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SUNKIST GROWERS INC - Valencia - Corporate Offices 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR QuantumClean - Fremont 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Phoenix B70 EOD 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meggitt (Rockmart) Inc. 965 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Sheboygan Memorial Medical Center 965 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHI Health Saint Elizabeth 965 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMPAM Parks Mechanical 965 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.