Housing programs, planning and development, government · California
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division
Fresno, CA · ~164 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.3
- Avg TCR
- 3.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Housing programs, planning and development, government workplace, earning a grade A.
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division: 1.3 TCR = 42% of Housing programs, planning and development, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division safety composite
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
60/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- B 1.33 per 100 workers
Safer than 78% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 0.91 per 100 workers
Safer than 45% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−0.8
2018→2019
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division injury rate improved
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.8 in 2018 to 0.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2018=1.8 · 2019=0.9
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 925110 · Fresno, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID
Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 42% of ind
- DART 0.9 DART
- RANK #2/8
- PHOTO City of Greensboro P…
- BOOK 2y book
- INJ 4 inj
- SIZE ~164 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: City of Greensboro Planning Department (0.1 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- City of Tempe
City of Tempe Community Development Department
1.6 TCR
- Project For Pr
Project For Pride in Living, Service Center
1.5 TCR
- This site
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division
1.3 TCR
- City of Greens
City of Greensboro Planning Department
1.2 TCR
- Housing and Co
Housing and Community Development
1.1 TCR
What this shows Fresno D.A.R.M. Division averages 1.3 TCR (42% of the Housing programs, planning and development, government BLS benchmark).
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division TCR series: 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.9 · BLS 3.2
Where Fresno D.A.R.M. Division falls in its industry
54 Housing programs, planning and establishmentsSafer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Housing programs, planning and employers in California.
Fresno D.A.R.M. Division has more employees than the Housing programs, planning and developme median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
925110 · CA · Fresno
54 Housing programs, planning and development, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | City of Greensboro Planning Department | 1.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Project For Pride in Living, Service Center | 1.5 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | City of Tempe Community Development Department | 1.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Housing and Community Development | 1.1 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Los Angeles Field Office | 164 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | City of Barstow | 164 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Marble Palace Inc. | 164 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Keolis Transit America | 164 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | County of Fresno | 7,553 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Ag Force LLC | 6,430 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Community Regional Medical Ctr | 5,549 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Community Regional Medical Center | 4,921 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Atlanta - Cobb Galleria (HP) | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | One Path, LLC | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Covenant Medical Group | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | APL Logistics / Hill's Pet Nutrition Bowling Green, Kentucky | 1.3 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Green Bay (HR) | 164 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Bella Terra Morton Grove Living and Rehab | 164 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Corporate - Bel Ridge, MO | 164 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | The Lodge of Four Seeasons, LLC | 164 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.