Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Texas

Futaba Industrial Texas

San Antonio, TX · ~342 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Futaba Industrial Texas runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Futaba Industrial Texas: 3.0 TCR = 55% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Futaba Industrial Texas safety composite

Futaba Industrial Texas scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2024

Futaba Industrial Texas injury rate improved

Futaba Industrial Texas's TCR fell 5.9 from 8.8 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.4 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · San Antonio, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 55% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO Sterling Stamping Pl…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~342 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sterling Stamping Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Futaba Industrial Texas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Futaba Industrial Texas averages 3.0 TCR (55% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Futaba Industrial Texas TCR series: 2016=8.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.4 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 5.4

Where Futaba Industrial Texas falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Texas.

Futaba Industrial Texas (342 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Futaba Industrial Texas
Futaba Industrial Texas (342 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Futaba Industrial Texas has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 10 1 0
2022 1.4 1.4 5 0 0
2021 2.1 1.6 5 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 3 0 0
2019 1.8 0.8 7 0 0
2018 2.9 1.8 13 0 0
2016 8.8 7.7 32 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · TX · San Antonio

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sterling Stamping Plant 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-Con Industries Ltd, Stamping Plant 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Adient, LLC Clanton 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kirchhoff Automotive Lansing 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ambrose Construction 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Richland Hills Plant 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc. 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens-Illinois 342 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Oaks at Towne Lake 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas Electronics Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trion Industries, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Machine Dynamics & Engineering Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carthage College 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA - Victorville - 18180 Gateway Dr - The American Bottling Company 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ability Counts Inc 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE Total Development Solutions 342 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.