Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals · Texas

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport

Freeport, TX · ~102 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals workplace, earning a grade A.

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport safety composite

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport: 0.0 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.0 in 2023 to 1.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331492 · Freeport, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO Mid-States Recycling…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mid-States Recycling & Refining (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport falls in its industry

132 Precious metals recovering fro establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Precious metals recovering fro employers in Texas.

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport (102 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport
Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport (102 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Gladieux Metals Recycling Freeport has more employees than the Precious metals recovering from scrap an median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331492 · TX · Freeport

132 Precious metals recovering from scrap and/or alloying purchased metals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 103 employers in Freeport, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mid-States Recycling & Refining 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Umicore EOM 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATI Specialty Materials - Monroe 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATI Powder Metals - Oakdale 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tier 1 Completions Solutions 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland Yard 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Denver City 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Baytown Service Center 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Freeport, Texas 4,279 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dow Texas Operations 3,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Cube Freeport Operations 1,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemical Manufacturing 933 FTE
NAT-TCR FXI - Portage 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Roberts Company, Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Acorn Electrical Specialists, Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Xylem Dewatering Solutions, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keystone Villa at Douglassville 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orchard-Rite 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Galvanizing 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Somerset Subacute and Care 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.