Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers · Michigan

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits

Highland Park, MI · ~1,368 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits runs at 206% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits: 4.5 TCR = 206% of Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits safety composite

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2021→2024

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits injury rate improved

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits's TCR fell 0.5 from 4.5 in 2021 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.5 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424820 · Highland Park, MI ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 206% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO 4818-NVCS
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 262 inj
  • SIZE ~1,368 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4818-NVCS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Wine and Spirits averages 4.5 TCR (206% of the Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits TCR series: 2021=4.5 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4 · BLS 2.2

Where Great Lakes Wine and Spirits falls in its industry

735 Alcoholic beverages, wine and establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Alcoholic beverages, wine and employers in Michigan.

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits (1,368 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 109 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Wine and Spirits
Great Lakes Wine and Spirits (1,368 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 109 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Great Lakes Wine and Spirits has more employees than the Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 3.5 57 0 0
2023 4.9 4.0 70 0 0
2022 4.8 2.9 69 1 0
2021 4.5 3.4 66 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424820 · MI · Highland Park

735 Alcoholic beverages, wine and distilled spirits merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Highland Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4818-NVCS 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4818-MO04 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Breakthru Beverage Colorado 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4818-48180050-11101 SMITTY LANE-WC 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Troy - Maple Road 1,361 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warren Stamping 1,356 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ventra Ionia 1,383 FTE
STATE-SIZE McLaren Healthcare Corp 1,353 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Seating Detroit 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR John E. Green Company 760 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yanfeng Highland Park 650 FTE
NAT-TCR 3638-T 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ayrshire 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Broken Arrow, OK 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pindel Global Precision 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Health First Inc 1,368 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMCasaPadre963 1,368 FTE
NAT-SIZE 61st Street Service Corporation (NY) 1,368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foothills Campus 1,368 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.