Central heating equipment and piping installation · Michigan

John E. Green Company

Highland Park, MI · ~760 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John E. Green Company runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Central heating equipment and piping installation workplace, earning a grade B.

John E. Green Company: 1.5 TCR = 54% of Central heating equipment and piping installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John E. Green Company safety composite

John E. Green Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2024

John E. Green Company injury rate improved

John E. Green Company's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.7 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Highland Park, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #36/153
  • PHOTO Elliott-Lewis Corpor…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 110 inj
  • SIZE ~760 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elliott-Lewis Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

John E. Green Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John E. Green Company averages 1.5 TCR (54% of the Central heating equipment and piping installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John E. Green Company TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.8

Where John E. Green Company falls in its industry

5,793 Central heating equipment and establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 153 Central heating equipment and employers in Michigan.

John E. Green Company (760 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate John E. Green Company
John E. Green Company (760 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

John E. Green Company has more employees than the Central heating equipment and piping ins median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.8 11 0 0
2023 1.8 1.1 20 0 0
2022 1.5 1.2 14 0 0
2021 1.6 1.0 12 0 0
2020 1.5 1.1 9 0 0
2019 1.4 0.9 9 0 0
2018 1.5 1.2 10 0 0
2017 1.6 1.1 14 0 0
2016 1.7 1.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MI · Highland Park

5,793 Central heating equipment and piping installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Highland Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elliott-Lewis Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total Fire Protection, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACI Mechanical, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois Piping Corporation 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dortch Enterprises, LLC 760 FTE
STATE-SIZE DETROIT NDC_1360762 761 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hollingsworth Corporate Office: Warren Ave. 761 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hi Tec Building Services 758 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Wine and Spirits 1,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Seating Detroit 903 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yanfeng Highland Park 650 FTE
NAT-TCR Mc Homer 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pt Washington Park 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Muscle Foods USA - Dunmore, Pa 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillside 3 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nevada 760 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wood County Hospital 760 FTE
NAT-SIZE VHS Corporate 760 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of North Carolina School of the Arts 760 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.