Motor vehicle seats manufacturing · Michigan

Magna Seating Detroit

Highland Park, MI · ~903 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Magna Seating Detroit runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Motor vehicle seats manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Magna Seating Detroit: 7.5 TCR = 138% of Motor vehicle seats manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Magna Seating Detroit safety composite

Magna Seating Detroit scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2016→2024

Magna Seating Detroit injury rate improved

Magna Seating Detroit's TCR fell 8.6 from 13.5 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.5 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Highland Park, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 138% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #91/100
  • PHOTO Main Plant
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 427 inj
  • SIZE ~903 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Magna Seating Detroit in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Magna Seating Detroit averages 7.5 TCR (138% of the Motor vehicle seats manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Magna Seating Detroit TCR series: 2016=13.5 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 5.4

Where Magna Seating Detroit falls in its industry

384 Motor vehicle seats manufactur establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #91 safest of 100 Motor vehicle seats manufactur employers in Michigan.

Magna Seating Detroit (903 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Magna Seating Detroit
Magna Seating Detroit (903 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Magna Seating Detroit has more employees than the Motor vehicle seats manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.2 20 16 0
2023 5.4 5.2 45 0 0
2022 5.2 4.5 56 0 0
2021 6.4 5.3 67 0 0
2020 7.4 7.0 40 0 0
2019 4.7 3.8 33 0 0
2018 12.2 10.9 84 0 0
2016 13.5 10.6 82 23 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · MI · Highland Park

384 Motor vehicle seats manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Highland Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main Plant 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Machine & Stamping 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR JVIS Territorial 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autoneum North America - Jeffersonville IN 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Power Middle School 903 FTE
STATE-SIZE Magna Mirrors- Newaygo 902 FTE
STATE-SIZE A20000 - Department of Transportation 904 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillside Elementary 902 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Wine and Spirits 1,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modular Automotive Systems Highland Park 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR John E. Green Company 760 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yanfeng Highland Park 650 FTE
NAT-TCR Republic Diesel Tri-State Machine 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix AZ FXFE-PHX 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pulaski 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR RC Metalworks- a division of Aero Mechanical, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MTN2 903 FTE
NAT-SIZE RWJ Health Network INC 903 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owensboro Independent 903 FTE
NAT-SIZE Retail Distribution West 903 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.