Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Maryland

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex

Essex, MD · ~53 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex runs at 470% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex: 9.9 TCR = 470% of Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex safety composite

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2023→2024

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex injury rate improved

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex's TCR fell 1.4 from 10.6 in 2023 to 9.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=10.6 · 2024=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Essex, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 470% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #35/35
  • PHOTO Service Quick Inc (SD)
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Service Quick Inc (SD) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex averages 9.9 TCR (470% of the Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex TCR series: 2023=10.6 · 2024=9.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex falls in its industry

2,560 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 35 Construction machinery and equ employers in Maryland.

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex (53 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex
Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex (53 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Groff Tractor Holdings (GTMA) Essex has more employees than the Construction machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.2 4.6 4 0 0
2023 10.6 2.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MD · Essex

2,560 Construction machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 19 employers in Essex, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Service Quick Inc (SD) 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abel Womack, Inc. - Edgewood 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 305 Colorado Fleet 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPATCO Energy Solutions, LLC - Knoxville Branch 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conowingo Generating Station 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cobb Road Facility 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 71 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE HESS Construction + Engineering Services 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DBA3 733 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DBA3 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR 01653 - STORE # 1653 ESSEX 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flavor & Fragrance Specialties 85 FTE
NAT-TCR Adjoin Veterans 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FOT Logistics LLC 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 3 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Freightliner Western Star of Maine - Westbrook 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Loven Contracting Inc 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE DAC (District Admin Center) 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roberts Swiss Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain Meadows Senior Living Campus 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.