Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations · California

Supported Employment Pasadena

Pasadena, CA · ~380 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Supported Employment Pasadena runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations workplace, earning a grade A.

Supported Employment Pasadena: 0.6 TCR = 29% of Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Supported Employment Pasadena safety composite

Supported Employment Pasadena scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Supported Employment Pasadena: 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2019

Supported Employment Pasadena's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813311 · Pasadena, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO AbilityFirst Fair Oa…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~380 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AbilityFirst Fair Oaks Site (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Supported Employment Pasadena in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Supported Employment Pasadena averages 0.6 TCR (29% of the Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Supported Employment Pasadena TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.7 · BLS 2.1

Where Supported Employment Pasadena falls in its industry

33 Developmentally disabled advoc establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Developmentally disabled advoc employers in California.

Supported Employment Pasadena (380 employees, TCR 0.6) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 306 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Supported Employment Pasadena
Supported Employment Pasadena (380 employees, TCR 0.6) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 306 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Supported Employment Pasadena has more employees than the Developmentally disabled advocacy organi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 0 3 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813311 · CA · Pasadena

33 Developmentally disabled advocacy organizations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 195 employers in Pasadena, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AbilityFirst Fair Oaks Site 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crosby Street Bookstore Cafe, Bar, and Thrift Shop, Broadway 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR L.L.Frank Work Center 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minnesota Department of Human Rights Commission 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 20500999-WARE01 WAREHOUSE 01 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packing Shed 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE BENTLEY Mills 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crittenton Services 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACCO Engineered Systems 4,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313-00000001 4,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Pasadena 2,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntington Hospital 2,228 FTE
NAT-TCR Polytech Plastic Molding Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hamilton Sundstrand Electrial Operations 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2029-CPN Billings/Collections 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sales - Section 32 - Bloomington, MN 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Washington (HR) 380 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHI National IT Center 380 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virginia Regional Medical Center 380 FTE
NAT-SIZE VF Jeanswear Mocksville 380 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.