Corporate offices · North Carolina

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office

Winston-Salem, NC · ~1,316 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Corporate offices workplace, earning a grade A.

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office: 0.2 TCR = 33% of Corporate offices BLS 0.7 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office safety composite

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office held a steady TCR band

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.4 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.4 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Winston-Salem, NC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #22/70
  • PHOTO Doe and Ingalls Mana…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~1,316 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office averages 0.2 TCR (33% of the Corporate offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office TCR series: 2016=0.4 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.2 · BLS 0.7

Where Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office falls in its industry

1,475 Corporate offices establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 70 Corporate offices employers in North Carolina.

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office (1,316 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office
Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office (1,316 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Hanesbrands Oak Summit Corporate Office has more employees than the Corporate offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.2 0.2 1 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.1 0.1 2 0 0
2019 0.4 0.2 5 0 0
2018 0.2 0.1 2 1 0
2017 0.3 0.3 5 0 0
2016 0.4 0.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · NC · Winston-Salem

1,475 Corporate offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 234 employers in Winston-Salem, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masonite Tampa Corporate Office 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Grove HQ 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Keene - Corporate Dr 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSCEXC 1,314 FTE
STATE-SIZE SERO-SOUTHEAST RESERVATIONS OFFICE 1,324 FTE
STATE-SIZE Industrial Technologies and Services 1,307 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vidant Health 1,306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center 4,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Budd Group Janitorial 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds American Inc. Trade Marketing Services 2,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds Marketing Services Company 1,600 FTE
NAT-TCR Unity Behavioral Health 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwire Heflin 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AUSBTXIB 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR RDMDWAMF 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE JE Richards, Inc. 1,316 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cornelia Plant 1,316 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stericycle - Bannockburn,IL-REMOTE 1,316 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pixar Animation Studios 1,317 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.