Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Washington

Harbor Place at Cottesmore

Gig Harbor, WA · ~62 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harbor Place at Cottesmore runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Harbor Place at Cottesmore: 3.6 TCR = 95% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harbor Place at Cottesmore safety composite

Harbor Place at Cottesmore scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2019→2024

Harbor Place at Cottesmore injury rate improved

Harbor Place at Cottesmore's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.5 · 2021=10.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Gig Harbor, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/109
  • PHOTO Legacy Estates
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Legacy Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Harbor Place at Cottesmore in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harbor Place at Cottesmore averages 3.6 TCR (95% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harbor Place at Cottesmore TCR series: 2019=4.5 · 2021=10.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Harbor Place at Cottesmore falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Harbor Place at Cottesmore (62 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Harbor Place at Cottesmore
Harbor Place at Cottesmore (62 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Harbor Place at Cottesmore has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 10.9 10.9 0 4 0
2019 4.5 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Gig Harbor

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 53 employers in Gig Harbor, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Legacy Estates 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Country House 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Joseph of the Pines Pine Knoll Villas 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lowrie Place 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warren Morgan Orchards 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis County PUD - Main Office 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unimark Construction Group, LLC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin PUD - Office 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR 46180001-461801 FRANCISCAN HEALTH ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-46180001-461801 730 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0624 - GIG HARBOR WA WHSE 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00691 193 FTE
NAT-TCR Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Chicago 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Iron Works Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 064 Austin RDC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hornwood Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edgewood Manor of Greenfield 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Optiforms 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryerson Lancaster 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sweetwater Transportation, LLC 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.