Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · North Carolina

Harris Family Practice

Laurinburg, NC · ~23 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harris Family Practice runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

Harris Family Practice: 8.8 TCR = 232% of Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harris Family Practice safety composite

Harris Family Practice scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.1

2016→2024

Harris Family Practice injury rate improved

Harris Family Practice's TCR fell 23.1 from 26.2 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 26.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=26.2 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=19.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Laurinburg, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 232% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #141/152
  • PHOTO Allina Health Bloomi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Allina Health Bloomington Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Harris Family Practice in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harris Family Practice averages 8.8 TCR (232% of the Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harris Family Practice TCR series: 2016=26.2 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=19.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=7 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Harris Family Practice falls in its industry

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e. establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #141 safest of 152 Family physicians' offices (e. employers in North Carolina.

Harris Family Practice (23 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Harris Family Practice
Harris Family Practice (23 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Harris Family Practice has fewer employees than the Family physicians' offices (e.g., center median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.0 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 19.9 19.9 4 0 0
2017 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2016 26.2 13.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · NC · Laurinburg

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 42 employers in Laurinburg, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Allina Health Bloomington Clinic 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10145) 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAROLINA DERMATOLOGY 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR INTEGRIS Health Affiliates, LLC 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTHERN PINES 1 SOW -EST 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cotton Gin 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monroe Growout 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scotland Memorial Hospital 864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scotland County Government 355 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1255 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1255 318 FTE
NAT-TCR Laredo Depot 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Berntsen Foundry Phelps Cast Location 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Surfaces of the Black Hills 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ken Forging Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #146 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Sleeve Bearing 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #118 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triad Transport, Inc. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.