Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · Washington

Haskell Corporation

Bellingham, WA · ~123 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Haskell Corporation runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Haskell Corporation: 0.3 TCR = 12% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Haskell Corporation safety composite

Haskell Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2024

Haskell Corporation injury rate improved

Haskell Corporation's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.5 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Bellingham, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/20
  • PHOTO Skanska USA Commerci…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Skanska USA Commercial Development (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Haskell Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Haskell Corporation averages 0.3 TCR (12% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Haskell Corporation TCR series: 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Haskell Corporation falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 20 Industrial building (except wa employers in Washington.

Haskell Corporation (123 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Haskell Corporation
Haskell Corporation (123 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Haskell Corporation has more employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · WA · Bellingham

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 210 employers in Bellingham, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Skanska USA Commercial Development 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 32003 - INVISTA - VICTORIA 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SI Group 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Hawk Inc 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE STS Remodeling Corp 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merit Electric of Spokane, INC. 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 21 - SCAFCO/Spokane 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jemco Components and Fabrication, Inc. 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Washington University 3,794 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Medical Center Main Campus 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Operations - Matrix Service Inc. 2,063 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHMG SJMC Clinics 864 FTE
NAT-TCR Gilbane Building Company Concord 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR West 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Specialty Contractors LLC - New Jersey 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Bay Packaging Fiber Resource Division 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Portland 222 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graco Inc. - Riverside Office Complex 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palram Americas 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Containers Savage 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.