Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels · North Carolina

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint

Durham, NC · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint runs at 342% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels workplace, earning a grade F.

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint: 10.3 TCR = 342% of Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint safety composite

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.8

2018→2020

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint injury rate improved

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint's TCR fell 14.8 from 20.1 in 2018 to 5.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=20.1 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Durham, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 342% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #218/239
  • PHOTO CDOR CHS Holiday, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CDOR CHS Holiday, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint averages 10.3 TCR (342% of the Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint TCR series: 2018=20.1 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=5.4 · BLS 3.0

Where HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel (except casino hotels) & establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #218 safest of 239 Hotel (except casino hotels) & employers in North Carolina.

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint (47 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint
HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint (47 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

HPW - Hyatt Place Durham/Southpoint has fewer employees than the Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 20.1 2.9 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NC · Durham

9,342 Hotel (except casino hotels) & Motels employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CDOR CHS Holiday, LLC 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Westin Nanea Ocean Villas 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1113 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LQ7005 Milwaukee Bayshore Area 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monroe NC Operations 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River Steam Station 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Resource Center PNG 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Charlotte 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR Omahaline Hydraulics 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Museum of the Bible 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 451 Portland, or 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DMH 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Michigan Department of Corrections - Southwest District Probation 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring Mills Elementary School 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacuzzi Corporate Services 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Green Bay Lab 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.