Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type · California

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG

Chino, CA · ~539 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type workplace, earning a grade D.

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG: 3.2 TCR = 150% of Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG safety composite

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG: 2.2 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2023

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG's TCR rose 1.9 from 2.2 in 2019 to 4.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.2 · 150% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #73/148
  • PHOTO Hubert Line
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~539 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hubert Line (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG averages 3.2 TCR (150% of the Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG TCR series: 2019=2.2 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 2.1

Where Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG falls in its industry

2,560 Refrigeration equipment repair establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 148 Refrigeration equipment repair employers in California.

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG (539 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG
Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG (539 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Hussmann Corporation- Chino MFG has more employees than the Refrigeration equipment repair and maint median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.1 3.6 21 2 0
2019 2.2 1.6 13 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CA · Chino

2,560 Refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services, industrial and commercial-type employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hubert Line 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR One Wind Services (US) Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orton's Equipment Company, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Southwest District : SVC-Albuquerque NM-USA 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE QuantumScape Battery, Inc. SJ1 539 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SAX2 539 FTE
STATE-SIZE Los Angeles Airport Marriott 539 FTE
STATE-SIZE SoMoCo Labor Supply Inc. 540 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2259 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Embassy Suites Dallas 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Peoria Marriott Pere Marquette 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parkland Medical Center 539 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-City Electrical Contractors, Inc. 539 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anvil International, Columbia Plant 539 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylor Commercial Foodservice, Inc. 539 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.