Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing · North Carolina

Illinis Tool Works

Charlotte, NC · ~54 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Illinis Tool Works runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Illinis Tool Works: 4.0 TCR = 120% of Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Illinis Tool Works safety composite

Illinis Tool Works scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Illinis Tool Works: 3.6 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2021

Illinis Tool Works's TCR rose 4.8 from 3.6 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333318 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO Whiting Systems, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Whiting Systems, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Illinis Tool Works in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Illinis Tool Works averages 4.0 TCR (120% of the Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Illinis Tool Works TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=8.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Illinis Tool Works falls in its industry

361 Cooking equipment (i.e., fryer establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Cooking equipment (i.e., fryer employers in North Carolina.

Illinis Tool Works (54 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Illinis Tool Works
Illinis Tool Works (54 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Illinis Tool Works has fewer employees than the Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.3 3.3 4 1 0
2020 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2018 6.7 1.7 4 0 0
2017 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2016 3.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333318 · NC · Charlotte

361 Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Whiting Systems, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Range NV 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vacutech 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TSS 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE ER LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elizabethtown 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Raleigh North 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31045 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR NPS Holdings LLC Cudahy 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR VenuWorks of Ames, LLC. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LaCorte Companies Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sterling Site Access Solutions, LLC. (Lufkin) 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Devils Backbone Outpost 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Division Jasper Complex 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agilex Fragrances, Somerset 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harold E. Robben, Jr. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.