Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers · California

Insulectro Lake Forest

Lake Forest, CA · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Insulectro Lake Forest runs at 229% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Insulectro Lake Forest: 5.0 TCR = 229% of Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Insulectro Lake Forest safety composite

Insulectro Lake Forest scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2024

Insulectro Lake Forest injury rate improved

Insulectro Lake Forest's TCR fell 1.0 from 11.1 in 2017 to 10.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.1 · 2018=15.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=10.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423690 · Lake Forest, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.0 · 229% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #25/30
  • PHOTO CON01 4 TECHNOLOGY DR,
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CON01 4 TECHNOLOGY DR, (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Insulectro Lake Forest in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Insulectro Lake Forest averages 5.0 TCR (229% of the Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Insulectro Lake Forest TCR series: 2017=11.1 · 2018=15.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=10.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Insulectro Lake Forest falls in its industry

155 Other Electronic Parts and Equ establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 30 Other Electronic Parts and Equ employers in California.

Insulectro Lake Forest (35 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Insulectro Lake Forest
Insulectro Lake Forest (35 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Insulectro Lake Forest has fewer employees than the Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Mer median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.1 10.1 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 15.6 12.5 5 0 0
2017 11.1 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423690 · CA · Lake Forest

155 Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 90 employers in Lake Forest, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CON01 4 TECHNOLOGY DR, 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NV01 NV01 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Memphis Area Distribution Center 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4028-ARW32 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Panasonic Avionics Corporation 2,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARB, Inc. 1,334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest 598 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASSA ABLOY Americas Residential, Inc., Lake Forest 594 FTE
NAT-TCR BP Luther collision, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mills Ford Lincoln 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Scotch Plywood Company Waynesboro Division 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NOVO Health Services - Atlanta 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hibshman Screw Machine Products, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sand Springs Home 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE LL Collision and Glass One, LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clay County - Highway 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.