Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Florida

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS)

Jacksonville, FL · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade C.

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS): 2.3 TCR = 88% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) safety composite

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) held a steady TCR band

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO Towson, MD (SSS, CSS)
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Towson, MD (SSS, CSS) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) averages 2.3 TCR (88% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Florida.

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) (22 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS)
Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) (22 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Jacksonville FS (SSS, CSS) has fewer employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.4 4.4 0 1 0
2018 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · FL · Jacksonville

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Towson, MD (SSS, CSS) 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Las Vegas FS (SSS, CSS) 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLS-CPIS-CHARLESTON,SC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nipomo FS (SSS, CSS) 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms Live Oak 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barben Fruit Company, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOARING EAGLE NURSERY 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery- Live Oak, FL 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Symbii South-Price 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AR FRT - Springdale 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 172 La Porte, TX (RDC) 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Valentine Commons 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lee's Summit FS (SSS, CSS) 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE The DM Burr Group - Brandon Schools 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE DHMS - Pharr 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lemont Yard 220 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.