General freight trucking, local · Ohio

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton

Dayton, OH · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade A.

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton: 1.8 TCR = 39% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton safety composite

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton: 1.2 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2020

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton's TCR rose 1.1 from 1.2 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Dayton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 39% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #37/186
  • PHOTO Ripato Trucking, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ripato Trucking, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton averages 1.8 TCR (39% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton TCR series: 2017=1.2 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=2.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 186 General freight trucking, loca employers in Ohio.

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton (73 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton
Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton (73 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Jet Transportation Systems - Dayton has more employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2018 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2017 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · OH · Dayton

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ripato Trucking, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jimmy T. Woods 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kay Polymer Trucking Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SNL Distribution Services Corp-New Orleans 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE A. Brown & Sons Nursery, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Shore 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE 971-NiSource-Toledo OH-Op Ctr Manhattan Blv 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greater Dayton Construction LTD 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Fort Worth-Samuels 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR EXO 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR International Paper Buena Park Crockett Container 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR All-Star-Woodbury 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Platt Bros. & Co., Inc 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ballast Point- Daleville 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenbrook Rehabiliation & Skilled Nursing Center 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interim and Briarwood HHC 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.