Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services · Wisconsin
JLM Advanced Tech. Service
Appleton, WI · ~107 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 1.5
- Avg TCR
- 2.1
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
JLM Advanced Tech. Service runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 1.5
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.1
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 6
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares JLM Advanced Tech. Service's OSHA Total Case Rate of 1.5 to the Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark of 2.1 (70% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
JLM Advanced Tech. Service's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.1 industry benchmark.
Where JLM Advanced Tech. Service falls in its industry
3,014 Paper making machinery repair establishmentsSafer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.
Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 94 Paper making machinery repair employers in Wisconsin.
Trend analysis for JLM Advanced Tech. Service
Between 2016 and 2018, JLM Advanced Tech. Service's Total Case Rate improved from 0.7 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 3.7, a spread of 3.7 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 3 reporting years, JLM Advanced Tech. Service recorded 6 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 6 injuries shown on this page for JLM Advanced Tech. Service are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 811310 - Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 100,402 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| JLM Advanced Tech. Service (this establishment) | 1.47 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial industry avg | 2.10 | BLS IIF, NAICS 811310 |
| Wisconsin state avg (all industries) | 4.92 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by JLM Advanced Tech. Service to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on JLM Advanced Tech. Service's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 70% of the Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services benchmark, JLM Advanced Tech. Service reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Paper making machinery repair and maintenance services sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is JLM Advanced Tech. Service's safety grade?
How many injuries has JLM Advanced Tech. Service reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Wisconsin, and by nearby establishments in Appleton - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~1.5)
Similar size (~107 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.