General warehousing and storage · Georgia

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta

Mcdonough, GA · ~126 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade C.

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta: 5.3 TCR = 92% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta safety composite

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta held a steady TCR band

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta's TCR held near 0.3 from 5.3 in 2022 to 5.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.3 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Mcdonough, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 92% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #408/506
  • PHOTO OES Equipment, LLC -…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OES Equipment, LLC - DFW (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta averages 5.3 TCR (92% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta TCR series: 2022=5.3 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 5.8

Where John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #408 safest of 506 General warehousing and storag employers in Georgia.

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta (126 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta
John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta (126 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

John Deere Regional Distribution Center - Atlanta has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 4.2 7 1 0
2023 5.1 4.4 7 0 0
2022 5.3 3.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Mcdonough

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 157 employers in Mcdonough, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OES Equipment, LLC - DFW 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SF-SUFFERN CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zurn Bensenville 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acme United Corp Rocky Mount, NC 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton - Crown, LLC - Atlanta East 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE J Hiers Company, Inc 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE D61 Atlanta 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dorsett Industries (Dalton, Ga) 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Luxottica Distribution and Manufacturing 1,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR McDonough, DC 827 FTE
CITY-NEAR PVH Corporation 761 FTE
CITY-NEAR Luxottica Atlanta Distribution and Manufacturing 727 FTE
NAT-TCR double kwik South 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR JTDM Enterprises, LLC. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Westin San Francisco Airport 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliable Electric 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE First Flight High 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Villa Grande Care Center 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE MPW Industrial Services, Inc. - Tesla 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cross Technologies Inc Corporate 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.