Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing · Mississippi

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg

Hattiesburg, MS · ~232 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg safety composite

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2018→2023

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg injury rate improved

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.5 in 2018 to 0.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Hattiesburg, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Nortek Global HVAC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~232 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nortek Global HVAC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg TCR series: 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg falls in its industry

461 Air-conditioning and warm air establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Air-conditioning and warm air employers in Mississippi.

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg (232 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg
Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg (232 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Johnson Controls - Hattiesburg has more employees than the Air-conditioning and warm air heating co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 3 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2019 1.3 0.9 3 0 0
2018 1.5 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · MS · Hattiesburg

461 Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 186 employers in Hattiesburg, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nortek Global HVAC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welbilt Kolpack 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennox Commercial Stuttgart 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerson 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ergon Refining, Inc. 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS200 - RIDGELAND 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8027204 Nike Adapt 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Chevron-Pascagoula 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR HATTIESBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hattiesburg 4,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processing Plant 1,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant 1,163 FTE
NAT-TCR Eagle Bluff 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Erie Technologies, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Helmkamp Construction Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Engineering 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schirm USA, Inc. 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Health Pharmacuetical Distribution Center 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE America's Service Line, LLC 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Collierville Tn 232 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.