Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) · California

Judicial Council of California

Name: Judicial Council of California Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

San Francisco, CA · ~583 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.5
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Judicial Council of California runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) workplace, earning a grade A.

Judicial Council of California: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Judicial Council of California safety composite

Judicial Council of California scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Judicial Council of California: 0.0 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2018

Judicial Council of California's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921120 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

DART 0.4 DART
RANK #2/17
PHOTO Michigan Senate
BOOK 2y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~583 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Michigan Senate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

MN House of Re

0.6
This site

0.5
Michigan Senat

0.5
Board of Count

0.5
4529_10118

0.4

What this shows Judicial Council of California averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) BLS benchmark).

Judicial Council of California TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1 · BLS 3.2

Where Judicial Council of California falls in its industry

158 Legislative bodies (e.g., fede establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 17 Legislative bodies (e.g., fede employers in California.

Judicial Council of California (583 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Judicial Council of California has more employees than the Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	1.0	0.4	7	0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921120 · CA · San Francisco

158 Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Michigan Senate	LANSING, MI	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	4529_10118	REIDSVILLE, NC	0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Board of County Supervisors	PRINCE WILLIAM, VA	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	MN House of Representatives	ST. PAUL, MN	0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Double V FLC, INC	DELANO	583 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Robotics and Digital Solutions Redwood City	REDWOOD CITY	583 FTE
STATE-SIZE	C-60 Berth 60	LONG BEACH	583 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CAB - City Administration Building	SAN DIEGO	583 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UC San Francisco	San Francisco	18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR	DoorDash, Inc.	San Francisco	12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UC San Francisco Health	San Francisco	12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices	San Francisco	11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR	Draper, UT	Draper, UT	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Linde - HYCO Laporte	Laporte, TX	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	DSSA-AZ	Mesa, AZ	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	BioScrip Infusion Services - Morris Plains - 2300	Morris Plains, NJ	0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	General Mills (Belvidere)	Belvidere, IL	583 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Company Wide	Glastonbury, CT	583 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA	Minneapolis, MN	583 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Northboro (Ma33)	Northboro, MA	583 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.