Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Kamps Coatesville

Coatesville, PA · ~141 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kamps Coatesville runs at 372% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Kamps Coatesville: 12.3 TCR = 372% of Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kamps Coatesville safety composite

Kamps Coatesville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.4

2023→2024

Kamps Coatesville injury rate improved

Kamps Coatesville's TCR fell 13.4 from 19.0 in 2023 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=19.0 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Coatesville, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 372% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #53/62
  • PHOTO Chico's Pallets Corp…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chico's Pallets Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kamps Coatesville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kamps Coatesville averages 12.3 TCR (372% of the Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kamps Coatesville TCR series: 2023=19 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Kamps Coatesville falls in its industry

952 Pallet containers, wood or woo establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 62 Pallet containers, wood or woo employers in Pennsylvania.

Kamps Coatesville (141 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kamps Coatesville
Kamps Coatesville (141 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Kamps Coatesville has more employees than the Pallet containers, wood or wood and meta median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 4.0 11 0 0
2023 19.0 10.5 19 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · PA · Coatesville

952 Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 46 employers in Coatesville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chico's Pallets Corporation 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR A One Pallet Distributing, Inc. 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Challenger Pallet Utah 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gateway Manufacturing, Inc. 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Pennsylvania - Blue Bell - Gas Operations 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE James Floor Covering, Inc. 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keystone Natural Holdings Philadelphia 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nature's Way Purewater Systems, Inc. d/b/a USHydrations 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland-Cliffs Coatesville 689 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Coatesville 683 FTE
CITY-NEAR ArcelorMittal Coatesville (EIN 20-0653500) 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US PA Coatesville 110 Stewart (5265) 442 FTE
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 186 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR YMCA of Memphis - Cordova 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hallmark Stone Company Acquisition LLC 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Raynor Overhead Doors and Gates, Inc. 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE City Hall 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cub Foods Knollwood - 5519 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cross City Lumber 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ct112 Haydon Kerk 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.