Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · New Jersey

Kamps New Brunswick

New Brunswick, NJ · ~58 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kamps New Brunswick runs at 450% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Kamps New Brunswick: 14.9 TCR = 450% of Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kamps New Brunswick safety composite

Kamps New Brunswick scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kamps New Brunswick: 12.8 → 16.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2024

Kamps New Brunswick's TCR rose 4.0 from 12.8 in 2023 to 16.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · New Brunswick, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.9 · 450% of ind

  • DART 16.9 DART
  • RANK #13/13
  • PHOTO CHEP Baltimore Servi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CHEP Baltimore Service Center (USIR) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Kamps New Brunswick in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kamps New Brunswick averages 14.9 TCR (450% of the Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kamps New Brunswick TCR series: 2023=12.8 · 2024=16.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Kamps New Brunswick falls in its industry

952 Pallet containers, wood or woo establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 13 Pallet containers, wood or woo employers in New Jersey.

Kamps New Brunswick (58 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Kamps New Brunswick
Kamps New Brunswick (58 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Kamps New Brunswick has more employees than the Pallet containers, wood or wood and meta median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.9 16.9 3 0 0
2023 12.8 11.7 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · NJ · New Brunswick

952 Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 50 employers in New Brunswick, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CHEP Baltimore Service Center (USIR) 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR EDWARD L BAKER ENTERPRISES INC CORNING FACILITY 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boyd's Industrial Woodwork, Inc. 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buckeye Diamond Logistics - Lima 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE UTY - New Jersey - Toms River,NJ 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE D K SOLUTIONS LLC OPERATING IN DE AS DNK SOLUTIONS LLC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caldwell Marine International, LLC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Railroad Construction Co., Inc. -Paterson 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR RWJ University Hospital New Brunswick 5,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson 2,828 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson Corporate New Brunswick 2,159 FTE
CITY-NEAR E. R. Squibb & Sons LLC - New Brunswick 2,002 FTE
NAT-TCR The Residence at Orchard Grove 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Generations at Regency 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pointe Frontier 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkview Care Center 14.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dual Language School 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carter Lumber 452 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burch Corporation 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caribou Highlands Lodge 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.