Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) · California

Keolis Transit America OCTA

Anaheim, CA · ~561 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keolis Transit America OCTA runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) workplace, earning a grade D.

Keolis Transit America OCTA: 5.8 TCR = 128% of Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keolis Transit America OCTA safety composite

Keolis Transit America OCTA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Keolis Transit America OCTA: 5.5 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2024

Keolis Transit America OCTA's TCR rose 0.5 from 5.5 in 2023 to 6.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 128% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #34/75
  • PHOTO Beaumont Transit
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~561 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beaumont Transit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Keolis Transit America OCTA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keolis Transit America OCTA averages 5.8 TCR (128% of the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keolis Transit America OCTA TCR series: 2023=5.5 · 2024=6 · BLS 4.5

Where Keolis Transit America OCTA falls in its industry

421 Commuter transit systems, mixe establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 75 Commuter transit systems, mixe employers in California.

Keolis Transit America OCTA (561 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Keolis Transit America OCTA
Keolis Transit America OCTA (561 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Keolis Transit America OCTA has more employees than the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e. median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 6.0 30 0 0
2023 5.5 5.2 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · CA · Anaheim

421 Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beaumont Transit 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55440 MetroAccess 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1182 FOREST GLEN MAINTENANCE 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cinder Bed Bus Facility 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOCAL BERRY GROWERS LLC 561 FTE
STATE-SIZE C09 561 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4813-48130009-FREEMAN EXPO ANAHEIM - 01160A 561 FTE
STATE-SIZE Joint Administration Office 561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilson Cattle Company 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Minneapolis 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Utslk - Salt Lake Airport 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Point of Beverly Hills 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Charles Blalock & Sons, Inc. 561 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carvana Indianapolis 561 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brooklyn Bedding 561 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ralph J. Stolle Countryside YMCA 561 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.