Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Alabama

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat

Huntsville, AL · ~136 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade B.

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat: 2.2 TCR = 65% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat safety composite

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2018→2022

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat injury rate improved

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.0 in 2018 to 1.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.0 · 2022=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Huntsville, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 65% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #10/23
  • PHOTO Acura of Auburn
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Acura of Auburn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat averages 2.2 TCR (65% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat TCR series: 2018=3 · 2022=1.4 · BLS 3.4

Where Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 23 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Alabama.

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat (136 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat
Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat (136 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Landers McLarty Dodge Chrysler Jeep Fiat has more employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2018 3.0 2.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · AL · Huntsville

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 454 employers in Huntsville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Acura of Auburn 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schaumburg Toyota Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kocourek Ford Lincoln 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCCURLEY INTEGRITY MOTORS, LLC 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE AL030 Fayette Sawmill 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper - Decatur, Alabama 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2489 Caldwell Court 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central States Manufacturing - Jasper 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR AL004 2,929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dynetics A Leidos Company 2,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leidos - Dynetics 2,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Motor Mfg of Alabama 1,874 FTE
NAT-TCR Century Gaming Technologies - Billings 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 103914 - City of Largo WWRF Biological Treatment 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlestown 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Olmsted Medical Center NW Clinic 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indiana Spine Group - Carmel 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3495-11DA083 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division #10 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auria St. Clair 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.