Commercial building construction · Maryland

Life Science Products, Inc

Chestertown, MD · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Life Science Products, Inc runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Life Science Products, Inc: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Life Science Products, Inc safety composite

Life Science Products, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Life Science Products, Inc: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 6.04× in 2024

Life Science Products, Inc's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2019 to 2.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 6.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Chestertown, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #12/99
  • PHOTO Roncelli Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roncelli Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Life Science Products, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Life Science Products, Inc averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Life Science Products, Inc TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Life Science Products, Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 99 Commercial building constructi employers in Maryland.

Life Science Products, Inc (30 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Life Science Products, Inc
Life Science Products, Inc (30 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Life Science Products, Inc has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MD · Chestertown

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 23 employers in Chestertown, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roncelli Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bancroft Construction Company 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fulcrum Construction Services, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DiMarco Constructors 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wildcat Point Generation Facility 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oliver Homes, Inc. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2016106 - NIST Building 245 Modernization T.O. #1 & 6 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2021156 - NIH VRC Lab Expansion - Building 40A 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dixon Valve and Coupling Company 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Heron Point 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Shore Medical Center at Chestertown 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Heron Point 123 FTE
NAT-TCR Composites One LLC - Ft Worth 905 Railhead 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Yaskawa America Inc., Motoman Robotics Division 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR N. J. Supermarket South Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR RBB Systems Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Turf Sales of Florida 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Front Range Energy LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montana Fence Billings Branch 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE K&M Tire Grinnell 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.